PMDG 777 hotfix 1 released

[psolk 3,244]

Available now in Operations Center

https://forum.pmdg.com/forum/main-forum/general-discussion-news-and-announcements/310600-28jun24-update-pending-for-pmdg-777-300er-first-bit-of-tweaking-as-we-go-into-the-weekend

[Fiorentoni 4,592]

Wow this guy really can't keep it short for once.

[Fatback 84]

Right on the ball, as usual. 

[SAS443 1,804]

12 minutes ago, Fiorentoni said:

Wow this guy really can't keep it short for once.

Odd comment since he literally provides a summary in the first paragraph.

"Captains,

SHORT VERSION:

<Snippet>"

But anything to throw shade, eh.

Edited Friday at 06:55 PM by SAS443

[psolk 3,244]

8 minutes ago, Fiorentoni said:

Wow this guy really can't keep it short for once.

First post is an RSR bash, that has to be a record even for a PMDG related post...  They are usually at least 3 or 4 posts in.

Thank you for your contribution to my informational post for PMDG 777 users.  

[cepact 533]

even the "short version" is too long and lacks spacing

just do a bullet list of each fix, is that so hard ?

[Christopher Low 5,507]

What is the matter with some of you? Is it so word not allowed difficult to read something that is more than one sentence long?

[Peter Z KCLE_EDDN 375]

Folks - please leave out the personal stuff and insults, or I’m going to shut this down.

To the OP, thanks for the heads-up, mate 🍻!

[Fiorentoni 4,592]

37 minutes ago, Christopher Low said:

What is the matter with some of you? Is it so word not allowed difficult to read something that is more than one sentence long?

If I want to read literature, I read literature. Don't have to make War & Peace out of a short hotfix list which is self-explanatory (e.g. "fixed some WASM crashes when using ACARS").

[Fiorentoni 4,592]

1 hour ago, SAS443 said:

Odd comment since he literally provides a summary in the first paragraph.

"Captains,

SHORT VERSION:

<Snippet>"

But anything to throw shade, eh.

You mean the paragraph where he writes "Without getting into much detail in this post"? 😂

Alright alright I'll stop it. The 777 is a great product and he can write all he wants as long as they deliver like this anytime.

Edited Friday at 08:09 PM by Fiorentoni

[DavidP 1,441]

22 minutes ago, Fiorentoni said:

You mean the paragraph where he writes "Without getting into much detail in this post"? 😂

Alright alright I'll stop it. The 777 is a great product and he can write all he wants as long as they deliver like this anytime.

If irritates you so much, don't buy the product.

[ahsmatt7 1,218]

1 minute ago, DavidP said:

If irritates you so much, don't buy the product.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. Or you just have an extremely big bias when reading posts. Either way you should read that post again.

[psolk 3,244]

1 hour ago, Peter Z KCLE_EDDN said:

Folks - please leave out the personal stuff and insults, or I’m going to shut this down.

To the OP, thanks for the heads-up, mate 🍻!

Thank you to all of you for volunteering your time and trying to keep us rowdy hoodlums in check 🙂  

[Bobsk8 13,075]

1 hour ago, Christopher Low said:

What is the matter with some of you? Is it so word not allowed difficult to read something that is more than one sentence long?

These "study level" wanabee  pilots would never make it in an airline environments. 

[scotchegg 4,343]

1 hour ago, Christopher Low said:

What is the matter with some of you? Is it so word not allowed difficult to read something that is more than one sentence long?

To be fair, English is not everyone’s first language and dense prose can be quite a slog in a second / third language. Bullet points would absolutely be a better way to itemize several short pieces of information.