Jump to content

JohnM

Frozen-Inactivity
  • Content Count

    10
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No
  1. That sounds very promising! I think the MU-300 Diamond is a beautiful looking aircraft! Mitsubishi must have got the basic design of the Diamond right for it to have remained in production for 31 years. I definitely hope to see a Flysimware Diamond!
  2. Yes, I would like to see the Westwind because it is an unusual aircraft that hasn't been done before. It gets boring when the same planes (or slightly different variants / year models of basically the same plane) are done over and over by every developer. Another aircraft that is lacking, which I would like to see, is the Beechjet 400 / Mitsubishi MU-300 Diamond II. A Turbo Commander 690 will also be great! So, yes, you have my vote for any unique aircraft that has been overlooked for far too long.
  3. I think the trim tabs should be animated... When trimming the aircraft, the trim tabs will move more than the control surfaces themselves would (since the tabs are so much smaller) and the trim tab's movement would therefore be more obvious than that of the trimmed control surface. The actual control surface's movement would be much less. In other words, the trim tabs will move more degrees than the actual control surfaces would when trimmed. I therefore think it will look best if the trim tabs are animated (as all other developers do with their aircraft). To add, another reason to animate the trim tabs is because the trim wheels themselves control the trim tabs directly. If you move the trim wheel you will expect to see the trim tabs move in a constant relationship to the trim wheel. The amount the control surfaces themselves move in relation to the trim tabs is not constant, because there is no direct link between the trim wheel's movement and the control surface itself. The force the trim tabs exert on the control surface is purely aerodynamic, and this force changes with the aircraft's speed. As an example, when you taxi, moving the trim tabs will have no effect on the control surface (even if the tabs are deflected all the way) since the speed is too low. At higher speed they will become more effective, but the trim tabs will still move more degrees than the control surfaces themselves. The trim tabs just need to be animated to move in the correct direction... For the MU-2 that means reversing the elevator trim tabs as well as the rudder trim tab animations. Since the MU-2 doesn't have ailerons, the wing's roll trim tabs on the MU-2 are already correctly animated as they are now.
  4. In real life, if the trim tab is all the way up, the aircraft would in fact want to nose-dive, NOT "nose up and stall". Having said that, I still think the Flysimware MU-2 is an excellent add-on. It is a very enjoyable aircraft to fly, the subject matter is interesting and overall well executed. I especially like the virtual cockpit, which is very nicely modeled. All proportions of the cockpit and instrument panel look like the real thing. I can definitely recommend the Flysimware MU-2 to anyone that likes this hobby.
  5. Both the ELEVATOR trim tab as well as the RUDDER trim tab animations are the opposite of what they should be. Hopefully this will be fixed.
×
×
  • Create New...